Film v’s Digital…why does Hollywood still shoot on film.
Friday, August 14th, 2009A Photographer’s Thoughts, Digital Vs. Film
There are impassioned supporters of both film & digital. As a photographer who has used film for over twenty years and digital for the last six years, I would have to say that, at the time of writing this it is just about a dead heat but if I had to pick one FILM for sure. Two things are important here, one you can turn a negative into a digital file, but you can’t go the other way. I tell all my couple do both. Shot on film, scan the negative and burn a disc, YES best of both worlds. But the big factor here is why do Hollywood film makers still shoot on film, Hollywood would be the first to go cheap….
WHY… BECAUSE IT IS BETTER, LASTS LONGER, IS RICHER,LOOK FOR YOUR SELF.
END OF STORY.
YOU TELL ME WHICH ONE IS BETTER,REALLY LET ME KNOW.
WHAT YOU THINK,THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS.
At least fairly recently (the last three years and especially this past year), film did surpass the quality of digital capture, in my opinion. Film does still handle certain situations better than digital, but for all practical purposes, they will both produce professional results IN THE HANDS OF A PROFESSIONAL.
Some of these photographer are 100% digital while others still prefer film only or a combination of the two. Digital, though, is revolutionizing the photographic industry in a way that has been nothing short of amazing. It is here in the present and will be down the road. And like computers, it will only get better, faster and cheaper .When researching a photographer who shoots digitally it is important to discern if that photographer is relatively new to the technology or has been using it for a longer period of time.
Examine photographs made by the photographer using digital capture. Most likely, that photographer will have work that was also captured with film. Compare them and see if you can tell the difference. I you will for sure. Don’t get such in to doing your important wedding day digitially just because it is easier for the photographer.
When I discuss digital vs. film with couples these days, I find much less resistance than I did a year ago. Couples are usually pretty tech savvy and often follow the developments in our industry, at least on the periphery.
Any opposition some might have to digital goes away when I show them images that are captured on digital (on a Canon 1d – 4.1 megapixel chip camera that are quite large .
They also see many images that have been captured on film, though scanned. Some poeple are able to notice the differences, but most really do not care, but you should. We have have had people call us who have lost there hard drive or computer and did not back files and guess what, up the creek with out a paddle.
What they care about are the images and the feelings that they capture and evoke. That is really what it comes down to and the main reason we are hired.
Digital does though, offer several advantages to the photographers while working…
1… The ability to see the image right away. This is my favorite reason for using digital capture. It gives me a level of comfort because I can see if my lighting, expression, exposure, etc. are correct right away rather than wait to see the film back from the lab in a few days.
2… The ability to change the ISO ( or the equivalent of film speed) on the run. This allows the photographer to go in and out of a myriad of lighting situations without having to suddenly change film to match the light levels from place to place at a wedding.
3… A virtually unlimited number of photographs can be captured at an event. This can be the boon and the bane of the photographers existence, though, because if you shoot them, you’ve got to edit them. But it frees the photographer from thinking “I can only shoot 10, 12 or whatever number of rolls of film at this event in order to keep it within budget.”
4… The ability to make black and white and sepia toned photographs from the digital capture. When one shoots digitally (unless they are captured in a black and white only mode on the Fuji S2) every photograph can become a black and white and/or sepia image. Parents may want an image in color, the couple may want to have it in black and white.
5… Freedom to experiment. This is a corollary to reason one. I will often shoot images that I would not even try with film because I know I will be able to erase it if it doesn’t work and modify it because I’ll be seeing the results immediately.
I was on a foreign trip last year and stuck in the bus on a rainy day. I literally pointed the camera out the window and just made some exposures just for the fun of it. And it was fun! Some of those images were totally unexpected and I would not have “wasted” film on it. But because I had the immediate feedback I could see what was working, modify it as I shot and make some different images.
Despite all the buzz about film vs. digital what it gets right down to when selecting a photographer are the images and personality.
Do you like the feel and the style of the images that the photographer shows? Do you LIKE the photographer? Do you trust them. We hope this helps, if you ever want to see the difference please let us know
Best Peter Bruce & team bELLE

























